" for implementation and execution of the buildings as passive houses, we are just as developer. This will, inter alia, again with the warranty obligation to you emphasized to be the owner. "
This was the response of FAAG to the request of the owners, such as those used in passive houses, the so-called passive house planning package (PHPP) to make available to the owners.
What to make of such assurance? I let the gentle reader judge this for yourself ... recommending, however, once more reading and some examples of the practical "work" of the administration of the court by the ABG to Sophie to heart.
The agreement for early termination of the management by the ABG WAY for a sub-community, the ABG was required to prepare the accounts for 2009 to end June 2010. Despite the written agreement that exist to date still does not - now no longer really believe the fact that the ABG ever made one last statement. The new administration takes over so therefore the perfect chaos ...
The other owners' association was actually sent on a statement last December 2010 for 2009. These included the following passage:
" The administrative board had access to all the accounting records and supporting documents on which this statement is based." This was so the owner suggested that all documents had been reviewed by the Management Committee. fact, still had no supporting documents of the Management Advisory Council took place. The Management Board was forced, therefore, the owner of this fact later to inform en
Intentional deception or just an oversight? No idea, the ABG has so far not even bother to comment on it ...
Another example: In May last year was a light indicator for one of the stairwells have been given to the administration.
As up to December last year, yet nothing had happened, I then finally the CEO of ABG, Mr. Junker asked to comment on this and the other above mentioned points position - until today no reply.
 | |||
| moisture damage in a stairwell, in detail | May 2010 |
 |
| The same image in February 2011 |
In the meantime, however, the ABG to communicate with the author by e-mail is rejected and is on the classical correspondence: If "you our proposal (the floor on in our apartment) come near, let us know your decision please see the ways the official postal route and not in the e-mail marketing. The same applies to future correspondence, if this is done by you with our company " -. Hopefully soon the messages do not have to be replaced by mounted messengers ... But that would be safe even for so notorious malcontents like me are which are in fact harassed extra
is an important aspect for any passive house That's it for now ... comments are as always welcome.
0 comments:
Post a Comment